AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
![]() The petitioners had not produced any material apart from their own statements to show that the exhibition of the serial was prima facie prejudicial to the community. The Union of India and the Doordarshan have pleaded that the serial was being telecast after following the prescribed procedure and taking necessary precaution. The producer of the serial had denied that the exhibition of the serial was likely to affect prejudicially the well being of the people. They had not asserted any right conferred on them by any statute or acquired by them under a contract which entitled them to secure an order of temporary injunction. The objection to the exhibition of the film had, however, been raised by them on the basis that it was likely to spread false or blind beliefs amongst the members of the public. They had not alleged that the Doordarshan had shown any undue favour to the producer of the serial and the sponsoring institutions resulting in any financial loss to the public exchequer. serial in question namely ‘Honi Anhoni’ was in contravention of any specific law or direction issued by the Government. The petitioners had not alleged that the exhibition of T.V. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |